Ace the North Carolina Security Guard Test 2025 – Your Future in Security Starts Now!

Question: 1 / 400

Can a security guard be held liable for failure to act in certain situations?

No, they are protected by legal immunity

Yes, if they fail to act responsibly and it results in harm or further criminal activity

A security guard can indeed be held liable for failure to act responsibly, particularly if such inaction leads to harm or allows further criminal activity to occur. This stems from the legal principle of "duty of care," which implies that individuals in security roles possess a responsibility to act in accordance with the level of training and awareness expected of them.

When a security guard is present and has the ability to intervene in a threatening situation, the expectation is that they will take reasonable actions to protect individuals and property, consistent with their training. If they neglect this duty – for example, by failing to respond to a clear and imminent threat – and this negligence results in injury or damages, they can potentially be held liable.

This liability applies regardless of whether they are officially on duty at that moment, as the responsibilities tied to their position may extend to situations where their presence could have made a difference. Thus, holding a security guard accountable for inaction serves both as a means of protecting individuals and as a reminder of the critical nature of their role in security and safety.

Get further explanation with Examzify DeepDiveBeta

Yes, but only if they are on duty at the time

No, liability does not apply to security roles

Next Question

Report this question

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy